• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Support the Center - Policy Website

Supporting Political Reform to Break the Two-Party Duopoly

  • About
    • Upcoming Topics
  • We Need Contributors
  • Domestic Politics
  • International Politics
  • Interviews
    • Clinton People
    • Trump People
    • Other Interviews
  • Contact Us
  • Shop
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • My account
  • Posts

rise of Trump

“Asymmetric Politics – Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats” – A Review of an Astoundingly Perceptive, Evidence-Based Book Shedding Light on our Divided Politics

February 21, 2019 by admin

US Political Polarization
“The Great Divide”

This is a book which sheds light on the mysteries of our current politics.   “Asymmetric Politics: Group Interest Democrats and Ideological Republicans” from Oxford Press, written by Matt Grossman of Michigan State and David A. Hopkins of Boston College, shows how the two parties are fundamentally different, and have been for a long time.  Their messaging to voters, use of media, attitudes towards social science and scientific research, conduct of campaigns, and governing objectives and styles are fundamentally different.  These differences explain contradictory behavior we see within each party and among voters.

Asymmetric Parties – the Key Difference:

Here is the key.  Republicans value ideological purity, with messaging adopted towards conservative abstract appeals.  Smaller government, government incompetence (real or fabricated), lower taxes, conservative social values, constitutional fidelity, nationalistic sentiment and for a portion of the populace and nativism are Republican themes that appeal to broad swaths of the public, even some Democrats.

Democrats, in contrast, value solutions delivering specific policies benefiting specific interest groups in their broad coalition.  Civil rights, LGBT rights, women’s rights, labor rights, rights of working class, and environmentalism are key areas of focus for Democrats.  Even when policies can be explained in terms of overall liberal objectives such as egalitarianism, Democrats avoid ideology in favor of pragmatic appeals to specific policy results and empirical practicality.

These different approaches, which are asymmetric, manifest themselves in different political messaging and different styles of governing, with Democrats emphasizing a pragmatic approach and Republicans emphasizing adherence to ideological goals. [Read more…] about “Asymmetric Politics – Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats” – A Review of an Astoundingly Perceptive, Evidence-Based Book Shedding Light on our Divided Politics

Filed Under: Domestic Politics, History - How Did We Get Here Tagged With: explaining gridlock, political parties, rise of Trump

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

  • Bill Hurst – Letter #2 to Baroda Township Voters – Looking At Economic Policy Strategically and Avoiding Bright Shiny Objects
  • Letter # 1 to Baroda Township Residents – Centrist Thinking and the Need to Preserve Our Democracy
  • Letter #3: The Attempt to Overturn the 2020 Presidential Election and the Risk It Poses to US Democracy
  • “Our Great Political Divide: Causes, Impacts, and Prospects” – A New Book by William G. Hurst
  • Understanding US Identity Politics

Archives

  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • January 2021
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • July 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • July 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in